Quantcast

Release candidates for QuantLib 1.10

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
10 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Release candidates for QuantLib 1.10

Luigi Ballabio
Hi all,
    preliminary tarballs for QuantLib 1.10 are available at <https://sourceforge.net/projects/quantlib/files/test> (no docs yet, but most changes are listed at https://github.com/lballabio/QuantLib/milestone/5?closed=1).  Please download them and try them out if you have a few cycles available.

Thanks,
    Luigi



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
QuantLib-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Re: [Quantlib-users] Release candidates for QuantLib 1.10

shailesh kumar
Hi Luigi,

I tried compiling preliminary tarballs for QuantLib 1.10 as available at <https://sourceforge.net/projects/quantlib/files/test> on OEL 6.7 (Oracle Linux Server release 6.7)
using gcc34/g++34 version gcc34 (GCC) 3.4.6 20060404 (Red Hat 3.4.6-19.el6)/g++34 (GCC) 3.4.6 20060404 (Red Hat 3.4.6-19.el6) along with Boost version 1.62.0

I am getting below compilation error.

../../../ql/experimental/math/tcopulapolicy.hpp:134:   instantiated from here
/scratch/ofsaadb/build/CAP802_JAVA7_O12C/BOOSTNEW/include/boost/math/tools/roots.hpp:68: error: no matching function for call to `get(const boost::fusion::tuple<long double, long double, boost::fusion::void_, boost::fusion::void_, boost::fusion::void_, boost::fusion::void_, boost::fusion::void_, boost::fusion::void_, boost::fusion::void_, boost::fusion::void_>&)'
make[3]: *** [gaussianlhplossmodel.lo] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/scratch/ofsaaweb/QuantLib-suncc/ql/experimental/credit'
make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/scratch/ofsaaweb/QuantLib-suncc/ql/experimental'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/scratch/ofsaaweb/QuantLib-suncc/ql'
make: *** [all] Error 2

Request to please help me resolving this issue.
This works if i use gcc/g++ version 4.4.7 compiler but fails for gcc34/g++34


Regards
Shailesh Kumar




On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 9:16 PM, Luigi Ballabio <[hidden email]> wrote:
Hi all,
    preliminary tarballs for QuantLib 1.10 are available at <https://sourceforge.net/projects/quantlib/files/test> (no docs yet, but most changes are listed at https://github.com/lballabio/QuantLib/milestone/5?closed=1).  Please download them and try them out if you have a few cycles available.

Thanks,
    Luigi



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
QuantLib-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-users



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
QuantLib-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Re: [Quantlib-users] Release candidates for QuantLib 1.10

Dirk Eddelbuettel

On 19 April 2017 at 00:23, shailesh kumar wrote:
| Hi Luigi,
|
| I tried compiling preliminary tarballs for QuantLib 1.10 as available at <
| https://sourceforge.net/projects/quantlib/files/test> on OEL 6.7 (Oracle Linux
| Server release 6.7)
| using gcc34/g++34 version gcc34 (GCC) 3.4.6 20060404 (Red Hat 3.4.6-19.el6)/
| g++34 (GCC) 3.4.6 20060404 (Red Hat 3.4.6-19.el6) along with Boost version
| 1.62.0
|
| I am getting below compilation error.
|
| ../../../ql/experimental/math/tcopulapolicy.hpp:134:   instantiated from here
| /scratch/ofsaadb/build/CAP802_JAVA7_O12C/BOOSTNEW/include/boost/math/tools/
| roots.hpp:68: error: no matching function for call to `get(const
| boost::fusion::tuple<long double, long double, boost::fusion::void_,
| boost::fusion::void_, boost::fusion::void_, boost::fusion::void_,
| boost::fusion::void_, boost::fusion::void_, boost::fusion::void_,
| boost::fusion::void_>&)'
| make[3]: *** [gaussianlhplossmodel.lo] Error 1
| make[3]: Leaving directory `/scratch/ofsaaweb/QuantLib-suncc/ql/experimental/
| credit'
| make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
| make[2]: Leaving directory `/scratch/ofsaaweb/QuantLib-suncc/ql/experimental'
| make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
| make[1]: Leaving directory `/scratch/ofsaaweb/QuantLib-suncc/ql'
| make: *** [all] Error 2
|
| Request to please help me resolving this issue.
| This works if i use gcc/g++ version 4.4.7 compiler but fails for gcc34/g++34

I hope you do realize that gcc 3.4 was released _eleven_ years ago.

Even 4.4.* is pretty ancient at an age of five years.

Dirk

|
|
| Regards
| Shailesh Kumar
|
|
|
|
| On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 9:16 PM, Luigi Ballabio <[hidden email]>
| wrote:
|
|     Hi all,
|         preliminary tarballs for QuantLib 1.10 are available at <https://
|     sourceforge.net/projects/quantlib/files/test> (no docs yet, but most
|     changes are listed at https://github.com/lballabio/QuantLib/milestone/5?
|     closed=1).  Please download them and try them out if you have a few cycles
|     available.
|
|     Thanks,
|         Luigi
|
|
|
|     ------------------------------------------------------------
|     ------------------
|     Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
|     engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
|     _______________________________________________
|     QuantLib-users mailing list
|     [hidden email]
|     https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-users
|
|
|
| ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
| engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
| _______________________________________________
| QuantLib-users mailing list
| [hidden email]
| https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-users

--
http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | [hidden email]

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
QuantLib-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Re: [Quantlib-users] Release candidates for QuantLib 1.10

Luigi Ballabio

I second Dirk that we probably shouldn't put much effort in making that code compile. However, we can disable it so that the build succeeds, even if the resulting library will miss a few features. In fact, I did the same thing recently for an older Solaris compiler. May you try running configure as

./configure CXXFLAGS='-DQL_PATCH_SOLARIS'

and see if you get to the end of the build?

Luigi


On Tue, Apr 18, 2017, 21:16 Dirk Eddelbuettel <[hidden email]> wrote:

On 19 April 2017 at 00:23, shailesh kumar wrote:
| Hi Luigi,
|
| I tried compiling preliminary tarballs for QuantLib 1.10 as available at <
| https://sourceforge.net/projects/quantlib/files/test> on OEL 6.7 (Oracle Linux
| Server release 6.7)
| using gcc34/g++34 version gcc34 (GCC) 3.4.6 20060404 (Red Hat 3.4.6-19.el6)/
| g++34 (GCC) 3.4.6 20060404 (Red Hat 3.4.6-19.el6) along with Boost version
| 1.62.0
|
| I am getting below compilation error.
|
| ../../../ql/experimental/math/tcopulapolicy.hpp:134:   instantiated from here
| /scratch/ofsaadb/build/CAP802_JAVA7_O12C/BOOSTNEW/include/boost/math/tools/
| roots.hpp:68: error: no matching function for call to `get(const
| boost::fusion::tuple<long double, long double, boost::fusion::void_,
| boost::fusion::void_, boost::fusion::void_, boost::fusion::void_,
| boost::fusion::void_, boost::fusion::void_, boost::fusion::void_,
| boost::fusion::void_>&)'
| make[3]: *** [gaussianlhplossmodel.lo] Error 1
| make[3]: Leaving directory `/scratch/ofsaaweb/QuantLib-suncc/ql/experimental/
| credit'
| make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
| make[2]: Leaving directory `/scratch/ofsaaweb/QuantLib-suncc/ql/experimental'
| make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
| make[1]: Leaving directory `/scratch/ofsaaweb/QuantLib-suncc/ql'
| make: *** [all] Error 2
|
| Request to please help me resolving this issue.
| This works if i use gcc/g++ version 4.4.7 compiler but fails for gcc34/g++34

I hope you do realize that gcc 3.4 was released _eleven_ years ago.

Even 4.4.* is pretty ancient at an age of five years.

Dirk

|
|
| Regards
| Shailesh Kumar
|
|
|
|
| On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 9:16 PM, Luigi Ballabio <[hidden email]>
| wrote:
|
|     Hi all,
|         preliminary tarballs for QuantLib 1.10 are available at <https://
|     sourceforge.net/projects/quantlib/files/test> (no docs yet, but most
|     changes are listed at https://github.com/lballabio/QuantLib/milestone/5?
|     closed=1).  Please download them and try them out if you have a few cycles
|     available.
|
|     Thanks,
|         Luigi
|
|
|
|     ------------------------------------------------------------
|     ------------------
|     Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
|     engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
|     _______________________________________________
|     QuantLib-users mailing list
|     [hidden email]
|     https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-users
|
|
|
| ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
| engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
| _______________________________________________
| QuantLib-users mailing list
| [hidden email]
| https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-users

--
http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | [hidden email]

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
QuantLib-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Re: [Quantlib-users] Release candidates for QuantLib 1.10

Luigi Ballabio

Oh, right, it was you for Solaris as well.  It's good to have an archaeologist around :)


On Tue, Apr 18, 2017, 21:28 Luigi Ballabio <[hidden email]> wrote:

I second Dirk that we probably shouldn't put much effort in making that code compile. However, we can disable it so that the build succeeds, even if the resulting library will miss a few features. In fact, I did the same thing recently for an older Solaris compiler. May you try running configure as

./configure CXXFLAGS='-DQL_PATCH_SOLARIS'

and see if you get to the end of the build?

Luigi


On Tue, Apr 18, 2017, 21:16 Dirk Eddelbuettel <[hidden email]> wrote:

On 19 April 2017 at 00:23, shailesh kumar wrote:
| Hi Luigi,
|
| I tried compiling preliminary tarballs for QuantLib 1.10 as available at <
| https://sourceforge.net/projects/quantlib/files/test> on OEL 6.7 (Oracle Linux
| Server release 6.7)
| using gcc34/g++34 version gcc34 (GCC) 3.4.6 20060404 (Red Hat 3.4.6-19.el6)/
| g++34 (GCC) 3.4.6 20060404 (Red Hat 3.4.6-19.el6) along with Boost version
| 1.62.0
|
| I am getting below compilation error.
|
| ../../../ql/experimental/math/tcopulapolicy.hpp:134:   instantiated from here
| /scratch/ofsaadb/build/CAP802_JAVA7_O12C/BOOSTNEW/include/boost/math/tools/
| roots.hpp:68: error: no matching function for call to `get(const
| boost::fusion::tuple<long double, long double, boost::fusion::void_,
| boost::fusion::void_, boost::fusion::void_, boost::fusion::void_,
| boost::fusion::void_, boost::fusion::void_, boost::fusion::void_,
| boost::fusion::void_>&)'
| make[3]: *** [gaussianlhplossmodel.lo] Error 1
| make[3]: Leaving directory `/scratch/ofsaaweb/QuantLib-suncc/ql/experimental/
| credit'
| make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
| make[2]: Leaving directory `/scratch/ofsaaweb/QuantLib-suncc/ql/experimental'
| make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
| make[1]: Leaving directory `/scratch/ofsaaweb/QuantLib-suncc/ql'
| make: *** [all] Error 2
|
| Request to please help me resolving this issue.
| This works if i use gcc/g++ version 4.4.7 compiler but fails for gcc34/g++34

I hope you do realize that gcc 3.4 was released _eleven_ years ago.

Even 4.4.* is pretty ancient at an age of five years.

Dirk

|
|
| Regards
| Shailesh Kumar
|
|
|
|
| On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 9:16 PM, Luigi Ballabio <[hidden email]>
| wrote:
|
|     Hi all,
|         preliminary tarballs for QuantLib 1.10 are available at <https://
|     sourceforge.net/projects/quantlib/files/test> (no docs yet, but most
|     changes are listed at https://github.com/lballabio/QuantLib/milestone/5?
|     closed=1).  Please download them and try them out if you have a few cycles
|     available.
|
|     Thanks,
|         Luigi
|
|
|
|     ------------------------------------------------------------
|     ------------------
|     Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
|     engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
|     _______________________________________________
|     QuantLib-users mailing list
|     [hidden email]
|     https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-users
|
|
|
| ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
| engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
| _______________________________________________
| QuantLib-users mailing list
| [hidden email]
| https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-users

--
http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | [hidden email]

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
QuantLib-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Re: [Quantlib-users] Release candidates for QuantLib 1.10

shailesh kumar
Hi Luigi/Dirk,

Thanks for your quick response. 

I am forced to perform role of archaeologist :) 

My Modified Duration component was earlier based on Quantlib 0.9.7 (last built in 2007) but in order to support "negative jumps in interest-rate curves"  and to incorporate other bug fixes, i upgraded the Quantlib version to latest keeping the compiler version same as component also had few external libraries dependencies built with gcc34/g++34

Luigi,

As suggested, I ran ./configure CXXFLAGS='-DQL_PATCH_SOLARIS' but it failed at squarerootprocessrndcalculator.cpp:64:   instantiated from here
Request to please guide so as to disable it at my end to proceed further. 

Regards
Shailesh Kumar





On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 1:05 AM, Luigi Ballabio <[hidden email]> wrote:

Oh, right, it was you for Solaris as well.  It's good to have an archaeologist around :)


On Tue, Apr 18, 2017, 21:28 Luigi Ballabio <[hidden email]> wrote:

I second Dirk that we probably shouldn't put much effort in making that code compile. However, we can disable it so that the build succeeds, even if the resulting library will miss a few features. In fact, I did the same thing recently for an older Solaris compiler. May you try running configure as

./configure CXXFLAGS='-DQL_PATCH_SOLARIS'

and see if you get to the end of the build?

Luigi


On Tue, Apr 18, 2017, 21:16 Dirk Eddelbuettel <[hidden email]> wrote:

On 19 April 2017 at 00:23, shailesh kumar wrote:
| Hi Luigi,
|
| I tried compiling preliminary tarballs for QuantLib 1.10 as available at <
| https://sourceforge.net/projects/quantlib/files/test> on OEL 6.7 (Oracle Linux
| Server release 6.7)
| using gcc34/g++34 version gcc34 (GCC) 3.4.6 20060404 (Red Hat 3.4.6-19.el6)/
| g++34 (GCC) 3.4.6 20060404 (Red Hat 3.4.6-19.el6) along with Boost version
| 1.62.0
|
| I am getting below compilation error.
|
| ../../../ql/experimental/math/tcopulapolicy.hpp:134:   instantiated from here
| /scratch/ofsaadb/build/CAP802_JAVA7_O12C/BOOSTNEW/include/boost/math/tools/
| roots.hpp:68: error: no matching function for call to `get(const
| boost::fusion::tuple<long double, long double, boost::fusion::void_,
| boost::fusion::void_, boost::fusion::void_, boost::fusion::void_,
| boost::fusion::void_, boost::fusion::void_, boost::fusion::void_,
| boost::fusion::void_>&)'
| make[3]: *** [gaussianlhplossmodel.lo] Error 1
| make[3]: Leaving directory `/scratch/ofsaaweb/QuantLib-suncc/ql/experimental/
| credit'
| make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
| make[2]: Leaving directory `/scratch/ofsaaweb/QuantLib-suncc/ql/experimental'
| make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
| make[1]: Leaving directory `/scratch/ofsaaweb/QuantLib-suncc/ql'
| make: *** [all] Error 2
|
| Request to please help me resolving this issue.
| This works if i use gcc/g++ version 4.4.7 compiler but fails for gcc34/g++34

I hope you do realize that gcc 3.4 was released _eleven_ years ago.

Even 4.4.* is pretty ancient at an age of five years.

Dirk

|
|
| Regards
| Shailesh Kumar
|
|
|
|
| On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 9:16 PM, Luigi Ballabio <[hidden email]>
| wrote:
|
|     Hi all,
|         preliminary tarballs for QuantLib 1.10 are available at <https://
|     sourceforge.net/projects/quantlib/files/test> (no docs yet, but most
|     changes are listed at https://github.com/lballabio/QuantLib/milestone/5?
|     closed=1).  Please download them and try them out if you have a few cycles
|     available.
|
|     Thanks,
|         Luigi
|
|
|
|     ------------------------------------------------------------
|     ------------------
|     Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
|     engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
|     _______________________________________________
|     QuantLib-users mailing list
|     [hidden email]
|     https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-users
|
|
|
| ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
| engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
| _______________________________________________
| QuantLib-users mailing list
| [hidden email]
| https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-users

--
http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | [hidden email]


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
QuantLib-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Re: [Quantlib-users] Release candidates for QuantLib 1.10

Luigi Ballabio
I'll look into it.  In the meantime, you might try downgrading to an earlier Boost version.

Luigi


On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 6:03 AM shailesh kumar <[hidden email]> wrote:
Hi Luigi/Dirk,

Thanks for your quick response. 

I am forced to perform role of archaeologist :) 

My Modified Duration component was earlier based on Quantlib 0.9.7 (last built in 2007) but in order to support "negative jumps in interest-rate curves"  and to incorporate other bug fixes, i upgraded the Quantlib version to latest keeping the compiler version same as component also had few external libraries dependencies built with gcc34/g++34

Luigi,

As suggested, I ran ./configure CXXFLAGS='-DQL_PATCH_SOLARIS' but it failed at squarerootprocessrndcalculator.cpp:64:   instantiated from here
Request to please guide so as to disable it at my end to proceed further. 

Regards
Shailesh Kumar





On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 1:05 AM, Luigi Ballabio <[hidden email]> wrote:

Oh, right, it was you for Solaris as well.  It's good to have an archaeologist around :)


On Tue, Apr 18, 2017, 21:28 Luigi Ballabio <[hidden email]> wrote:

I second Dirk that we probably shouldn't put much effort in making that code compile. However, we can disable it so that the build succeeds, even if the resulting library will miss a few features. In fact, I did the same thing recently for an older Solaris compiler. May you try running configure as

./configure CXXFLAGS='-DQL_PATCH_SOLARIS'

and see if you get to the end of the build?

Luigi


On Tue, Apr 18, 2017, 21:16 Dirk Eddelbuettel <[hidden email]> wrote:

On 19 April 2017 at 00:23, shailesh kumar wrote:
| Hi Luigi,
|
| I tried compiling preliminary tarballs for QuantLib 1.10 as available at <
| https://sourceforge.net/projects/quantlib/files/test> on OEL 6.7 (Oracle Linux
| Server release 6.7)
| using gcc34/g++34 version gcc34 (GCC) 3.4.6 20060404 (Red Hat 3.4.6-19.el6)/
| g++34 (GCC) 3.4.6 20060404 (Red Hat 3.4.6-19.el6) along with Boost version
| 1.62.0
|
| I am getting below compilation error.
|
| ../../../ql/experimental/math/tcopulapolicy.hpp:134:   instantiated from here
| /scratch/ofsaadb/build/CAP802_JAVA7_O12C/BOOSTNEW/include/boost/math/tools/
| roots.hpp:68: error: no matching function for call to `get(const
| boost::fusion::tuple<long double, long double, boost::fusion::void_,
| boost::fusion::void_, boost::fusion::void_, boost::fusion::void_,
| boost::fusion::void_, boost::fusion::void_, boost::fusion::void_,
| boost::fusion::void_>&)'
| make[3]: *** [gaussianlhplossmodel.lo] Error 1
| make[3]: Leaving directory `/scratch/ofsaaweb/QuantLib-suncc/ql/experimental/
| credit'
| make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
| make[2]: Leaving directory `/scratch/ofsaaweb/QuantLib-suncc/ql/experimental'
| make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
| make[1]: Leaving directory `/scratch/ofsaaweb/QuantLib-suncc/ql'
| make: *** [all] Error 2
|
| Request to please help me resolving this issue.
| This works if i use gcc/g++ version 4.4.7 compiler but fails for gcc34/g++34

I hope you do realize that gcc 3.4 was released _eleven_ years ago.

Even 4.4.* is pretty ancient at an age of five years.

Dirk

|
|
| Regards
| Shailesh Kumar
|
|
|
|
| On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 9:16 PM, Luigi Ballabio <[hidden email]>
| wrote:
|
|     Hi all,
|         preliminary tarballs for QuantLib 1.10 are available at <https://
|     sourceforge.net/projects/quantlib/files/test> (no docs yet, but most
|     changes are listed at https://github.com/lballabio/QuantLib/milestone/5?
|     closed=1).  Please download them and try them out if you have a few cycles
|     available.
|
|     Thanks,
|         Luigi
|
|
|
|     ------------------------------------------------------------
|     ------------------
|     Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
|     engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
|     _______________________________________________
|     QuantLib-users mailing list
|     [hidden email]
|     https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-users
|
|
|
| ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
| engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
| _______________________________________________
| QuantLib-users mailing list
| [hidden email]
| https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-users

--
http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | [hidden email]


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
QuantLib-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Re: [Quantlib-users] Release candidates for QuantLib 1.10

Luigi Ballabio
In reply to this post by shailesh kumar
For instance, Boost 1.54 seems to work (apart from linking, but that might be an issue with the installation of gcc 3.4.6 I'm using).

Luigi


On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 5:07 PM Luigi Ballabio <[hidden email]> wrote:
Please try to see if the gcc-3.4 branch on GitHub works for you.  If so, clone it in your repo so that you can maintain it in the future: I probably won't include the changes in version 1.10.  My suggestion of testing earlier versions of Boost stands: most if not all the errors came from Boost code.

Luigi


On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 6:03 AM shailesh kumar <[hidden email]> wrote:
Hi Luigi/Dirk,

Thanks for your quick response. 

I am forced to perform role of archaeologist :) 

My Modified Duration component was earlier based on Quantlib 0.9.7 (last built in 2007) but in order to support "negative jumps in interest-rate curves"  and to incorporate other bug fixes, i upgraded the Quantlib version to latest keeping the compiler version same as component also had few external libraries dependencies built with gcc34/g++34

Luigi,

As suggested, I ran ./configure CXXFLAGS='-DQL_PATCH_SOLARIS' but it failed at squarerootprocessrndcalculator.cpp:64:   instantiated from here
Request to please guide so as to disable it at my end to proceed further. 

Regards
Shailesh Kumar





On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 1:05 AM, Luigi Ballabio <[hidden email]> wrote:

Oh, right, it was you for Solaris as well.  It's good to have an archaeologist around :)


On Tue, Apr 18, 2017, 21:28 Luigi Ballabio <[hidden email]> wrote:

I second Dirk that we probably shouldn't put much effort in making that code compile. However, we can disable it so that the build succeeds, even if the resulting library will miss a few features. In fact, I did the same thing recently for an older Solaris compiler. May you try running configure as

./configure CXXFLAGS='-DQL_PATCH_SOLARIS'

and see if you get to the end of the build?

Luigi


On Tue, Apr 18, 2017, 21:16 Dirk Eddelbuettel <[hidden email]> wrote:

On 19 April 2017 at 00:23, shailesh kumar wrote:
| Hi Luigi,
|
| I tried compiling preliminary tarballs for QuantLib 1.10 as available at <
| https://sourceforge.net/projects/quantlib/files/test> on OEL 6.7 (Oracle Linux
| Server release 6.7)
| using gcc34/g++34 version gcc34 (GCC) 3.4.6 20060404 (Red Hat 3.4.6-19.el6)/
| g++34 (GCC) 3.4.6 20060404 (Red Hat 3.4.6-19.el6) along with Boost version
| 1.62.0
|
| I am getting below compilation error.
|
| ../../../ql/experimental/math/tcopulapolicy.hpp:134:   instantiated from here
| /scratch/ofsaadb/build/CAP802_JAVA7_O12C/BOOSTNEW/include/boost/math/tools/
| roots.hpp:68: error: no matching function for call to `get(const
| boost::fusion::tuple<long double, long double, boost::fusion::void_,
| boost::fusion::void_, boost::fusion::void_, boost::fusion::void_,
| boost::fusion::void_, boost::fusion::void_, boost::fusion::void_,
| boost::fusion::void_>&)'
| make[3]: *** [gaussianlhplossmodel.lo] Error 1
| make[3]: Leaving directory `/scratch/ofsaaweb/QuantLib-suncc/ql/experimental/
| credit'
| make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
| make[2]: Leaving directory `/scratch/ofsaaweb/QuantLib-suncc/ql/experimental'
| make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
| make[1]: Leaving directory `/scratch/ofsaaweb/QuantLib-suncc/ql'
| make: *** [all] Error 2
|
| Request to please help me resolving this issue.
| This works if i use gcc/g++ version 4.4.7 compiler but fails for gcc34/g++34

I hope you do realize that gcc 3.4 was released _eleven_ years ago.

Even 4.4.* is pretty ancient at an age of five years.

Dirk

|
|
| Regards
| Shailesh Kumar
|
|
|
|
| On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 9:16 PM, Luigi Ballabio <[hidden email]>
| wrote:
|
|     Hi all,
|         preliminary tarballs for QuantLib 1.10 are available at <https://
|     sourceforge.net/projects/quantlib/files/test> (no docs yet, but most
|     changes are listed at https://github.com/lballabio/QuantLib/milestone/5?
|     closed=1).  Please download them and try them out if you have a few cycles
|     available.
|
|     Thanks,
|         Luigi
|
|
|
|     ------------------------------------------------------------
|     ------------------
|     Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
|     engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
|     _______________________________________________
|     QuantLib-users mailing list
|     [hidden email]
|     https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-users
|
|
|
| ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
| engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
| _______________________________________________
| QuantLib-users mailing list
| [hidden email]
| https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-users

--
http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | [hidden email]


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
QuantLib-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Re: [Quantlib-users] Release candidates for QuantLib 1.10

shailesh kumar
Hi Luigi,

The gcc-3.4 branch on GitHub didn't work and landed up in compilation issues. 

In order to maintain uniformity in Quantlib source code across all OS, i have used Quantlib 1.10 with boost 1.54.0 to compile with gcc34/g++34 on OEL 6 and build went through successfully.

I am targeting Quantlib build on other OS such as OEL 7 (gcc/g++) , AIX 6.1 / 7.1 (xlc_r/xlC_r) , Sun Solaris 10/11 (cc/CC) and will update in couple of days.

Thanks for your help.

Regards
Shailesh Kumar








On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 9:41 PM, Luigi Ballabio <[hidden email]> wrote:
For instance, Boost 1.54 seems to work (apart from linking, but that might be an issue with the installation of gcc 3.4.6 I'm using).

Luigi


On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 5:07 PM Luigi Ballabio <[hidden email]> wrote:
Please try to see if the gcc-3.4 branch on GitHub works for you.  If so, clone it in your repo so that you can maintain it in the future: I probably won't include the changes in version 1.10.  My suggestion of testing earlier versions of Boost stands: most if not all the errors came from Boost code.

Luigi


On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 6:03 AM shailesh kumar <[hidden email]> wrote:
Hi Luigi/Dirk,

Thanks for your quick response. 

I am forced to perform role of archaeologist :) 

My Modified Duration component was earlier based on Quantlib 0.9.7 (last built in 2007) but in order to support "negative jumps in interest-rate curves"  and to incorporate other bug fixes, i upgraded the Quantlib version to latest keeping the compiler version same as component also had few external libraries dependencies built with gcc34/g++34

Luigi,

As suggested, I ran ./configure CXXFLAGS='-DQL_PATCH_SOLARIS' but it failed at squarerootprocessrndcalculator.cpp:64:   instantiated from here
Request to please guide so as to disable it at my end to proceed further. 

Regards
Shailesh Kumar





On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 1:05 AM, Luigi Ballabio <[hidden email]> wrote:

Oh, right, it was you for Solaris as well.  It's good to have an archaeologist around :)


On Tue, Apr 18, 2017, 21:28 Luigi Ballabio <[hidden email]> wrote:

I second Dirk that we probably shouldn't put much effort in making that code compile. However, we can disable it so that the build succeeds, even if the resulting library will miss a few features. In fact, I did the same thing recently for an older Solaris compiler. May you try running configure as

./configure CXXFLAGS='-DQL_PATCH_SOLARIS'

and see if you get to the end of the build?

Luigi


On Tue, Apr 18, 2017, 21:16 Dirk Eddelbuettel <[hidden email]> wrote:

On 19 April 2017 at 00:23, shailesh kumar wrote:
| Hi Luigi,
|
| I tried compiling preliminary tarballs for QuantLib 1.10 as available at <
| https://sourceforge.net/projects/quantlib/files/test> on OEL 6.7 (Oracle Linux
| Server release 6.7)
| using gcc34/g++34 version gcc34 (GCC) 3.4.6 20060404 (Red Hat 3.4.6-19.el6)/
| g++34 (GCC) 3.4.6 20060404 (Red Hat 3.4.6-19.el6) along with Boost version
| 1.62.0
|
| I am getting below compilation error.
|
| ../../../ql/experimental/math/tcopulapolicy.hpp:134:   instantiated from here
| /scratch/ofsaadb/build/CAP802_JAVA7_O12C/BOOSTNEW/include/boost/math/tools/
| roots.hpp:68: error: no matching function for call to `get(const
| boost::fusion::tuple<long double, long double, boost::fusion::void_,
| boost::fusion::void_, boost::fusion::void_, boost::fusion::void_,
| boost::fusion::void_, boost::fusion::void_, boost::fusion::void_,
| boost::fusion::void_>&)'
| make[3]: *** [gaussianlhplossmodel.lo] Error 1
| make[3]: Leaving directory `/scratch/ofsaaweb/QuantLib-suncc/ql/experimental/
| credit'
| make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
| make[2]: Leaving directory `/scratch/ofsaaweb/QuantLib-suncc/ql/experimental'
| make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
| make[1]: Leaving directory `/scratch/ofsaaweb/QuantLib-suncc/ql'
| make: *** [all] Error 2
|
| Request to please help me resolving this issue.
| This works if i use gcc/g++ version 4.4.7 compiler but fails for gcc34/g++34

I hope you do realize that gcc 3.4 was released _eleven_ years ago.

Even 4.4.* is pretty ancient at an age of five years.

Dirk

|
|
| Regards
| Shailesh Kumar
|
|
|
|
| On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 9:16 PM, Luigi Ballabio <[hidden email]>
| wrote:
|
|     Hi all,
|         preliminary tarballs for QuantLib 1.10 are available at <https://
|     sourceforge.net/projects/quantlib/files/test> (no docs yet, but most
|     changes are listed at https://github.com/lballabio/QuantLib/milestone/5?
|     closed=1).  Please download them and try them out if you have a few cycles
|     available.
|
|     Thanks,
|         Luigi
|
|
|
|     ------------------------------------------------------------
|     ------------------
|     Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
|     engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
|     _______________________________________________
|     QuantLib-users mailing list
|     [hidden email]
|     https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-users
|
|
|
| ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
| engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
| _______________________________________________
| QuantLib-users mailing list
| [hidden email]
| https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-users

--
http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | [hidden email]



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
QuantLib-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Re: [Quantlib-users] Release candidates for QuantLib 1.10

Luigi Ballabio

Ok, thanks. I guess I'll just delete the gcc 3.4 branch then.


On Wed, Apr 19, 2017, 22:46 shailesh kumar <[hidden email]> wrote:
Hi Luigi,

The gcc-3.4 branch on GitHub didn't work and landed up in compilation issues. 

In order to maintain uniformity in Quantlib source code across all OS, i have used Quantlib 1.10 with boost 1.54.0 to compile with gcc34/g++34 on OEL 6 and build went through successfully.

I am targeting Quantlib build on other OS such as OEL 7 (gcc/g++) , AIX 6.1 / 7.1 (xlc_r/xlC_r) , Sun Solaris 10/11 (cc/CC) and will update in couple of days.

Thanks for your help.

Regards
Shailesh Kumar








On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 9:41 PM, Luigi Ballabio <[hidden email]> wrote:
For instance, Boost 1.54 seems to work (apart from linking, but that might be an issue with the installation of gcc 3.4.6 I'm using).

Luigi


On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 5:07 PM Luigi Ballabio <[hidden email]> wrote:
Please try to see if the gcc-3.4 branch on GitHub works for you.  If so, clone it in your repo so that you can maintain it in the future: I probably won't include the changes in version 1.10.  My suggestion of testing earlier versions of Boost stands: most if not all the errors came from Boost code.

Luigi


On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 6:03 AM shailesh kumar <[hidden email]> wrote:
Hi Luigi/Dirk,

Thanks for your quick response. 

I am forced to perform role of archaeologist :) 

My Modified Duration component was earlier based on Quantlib 0.9.7 (last built in 2007) but in order to support "negative jumps in interest-rate curves"  and to incorporate other bug fixes, i upgraded the Quantlib version to latest keeping the compiler version same as component also had few external libraries dependencies built with gcc34/g++34

Luigi,

As suggested, I ran ./configure CXXFLAGS='-DQL_PATCH_SOLARIS' but it failed at squarerootprocessrndcalculator.cpp:64:   instantiated from here
Request to please guide so as to disable it at my end to proceed further. 

Regards
Shailesh Kumar





On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 1:05 AM, Luigi Ballabio <[hidden email]> wrote:

Oh, right, it was you for Solaris as well.  It's good to have an archaeologist around :)


On Tue, Apr 18, 2017, 21:28 Luigi Ballabio <[hidden email]> wrote:

I second Dirk that we probably shouldn't put much effort in making that code compile. However, we can disable it so that the build succeeds, even if the resulting library will miss a few features. In fact, I did the same thing recently for an older Solaris compiler. May you try running configure as

./configure CXXFLAGS='-DQL_PATCH_SOLARIS'

and see if you get to the end of the build?

Luigi


On Tue, Apr 18, 2017, 21:16 Dirk Eddelbuettel <[hidden email]> wrote:

On 19 April 2017 at 00:23, shailesh kumar wrote:
| Hi Luigi,
|
| I tried compiling preliminary tarballs for QuantLib 1.10 as available at <
| https://sourceforge.net/projects/quantlib/files/test> on OEL 6.7 (Oracle Linux
| Server release 6.7)
| using gcc34/g++34 version gcc34 (GCC) 3.4.6 20060404 (Red Hat 3.4.6-19.el6)/
| g++34 (GCC) 3.4.6 20060404 (Red Hat 3.4.6-19.el6) along with Boost version
| 1.62.0
|
| I am getting below compilation error.
|
| ../../../ql/experimental/math/tcopulapolicy.hpp:134:   instantiated from here
| /scratch/ofsaadb/build/CAP802_JAVA7_O12C/BOOSTNEW/include/boost/math/tools/
| roots.hpp:68: error: no matching function for call to `get(const
| boost::fusion::tuple<long double, long double, boost::fusion::void_,
| boost::fusion::void_, boost::fusion::void_, boost::fusion::void_,
| boost::fusion::void_, boost::fusion::void_, boost::fusion::void_,
| boost::fusion::void_>&)'
| make[3]: *** [gaussianlhplossmodel.lo] Error 1
| make[3]: Leaving directory `/scratch/ofsaaweb/QuantLib-suncc/ql/experimental/
| credit'
| make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
| make[2]: Leaving directory `/scratch/ofsaaweb/QuantLib-suncc/ql/experimental'
| make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
| make[1]: Leaving directory `/scratch/ofsaaweb/QuantLib-suncc/ql'
| make: *** [all] Error 2
|
| Request to please help me resolving this issue.
| This works if i use gcc/g++ version 4.4.7 compiler but fails for gcc34/g++34

I hope you do realize that gcc 3.4 was released _eleven_ years ago.

Even 4.4.* is pretty ancient at an age of five years.

Dirk

|
|
| Regards
| Shailesh Kumar
|
|
|
|
| On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 9:16 PM, Luigi Ballabio <[hidden email]>
| wrote:
|
|     Hi all,
|         preliminary tarballs for QuantLib 1.10 are available at <https://
|     sourceforge.net/projects/quantlib/files/test> (no docs yet, but most
|     changes are listed at https://github.com/lballabio/QuantLib/milestone/5?
|     closed=1).  Please download them and try them out if you have a few cycles
|     available.
|
|     Thanks,
|         Luigi
|
|
|
|     ------------------------------------------------------------
|     ------------------
|     Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
|     engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
|     _______________________________________________
|     QuantLib-users mailing list
|     [hidden email]
|     https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-users
|
|
|
| ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
| engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
| _______________________________________________
| QuantLib-users mailing list
| [hidden email]
| https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-users

--
http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | [hidden email]



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
QuantLib-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-dev
Loading...